Security Guard Service Was Temporary

March 1, 1997

LVT Number: 11331

(Decision submitted by Benjamin Binder of the Manhattan law firm of Shaw & Binder, attorneys for the landlord.) Tenants complained of a reduction in building-wide services. They claimed that landlord had eliminated uniformed security guard services. The DRA ruled for tenants. Landlord appealed, arguing that the security guard service was temporary. Guards were hired at various times as a short-term, emergency measure, in response to criminal activity at the building and without charge to tenants. The DHCR ruled for landlord.

(Decision submitted by Benjamin Binder of the Manhattan law firm of Shaw & Binder, attorneys for the landlord.) Tenants complained of a reduction in building-wide services. They claimed that landlord had eliminated uniformed security guard services. The DRA ruled for tenants. Landlord appealed, arguing that the security guard service was temporary. Guards were hired at various times as a short-term, emergency measure, in response to criminal activity at the building and without charge to tenants. The DHCR ruled for landlord. The security guard service was temporary and intermittent, provided by landlord without charge in response to an emergency situation.

Boulevard Tenants Corp./Algin Mgmt. Co.: DHCR Adm. Rev. Dckt. Nos. IK130149RO-IK130153RO (11/4/96) [3-page document]

Downloads

IK130149RO.pdf209.79 KB

Topics

More like this