Ramp Alone Doesn't Qualify

LVT Number: 14366

(DHCR prior opinion submitted by Hadassah S. Kwestel of the Hewlett, N.Y., law firm of Pennisi, Daniels & Norelli, LLP, attorneys for the landlord.) Landlord asked the DHCR for a prior opinion as to whether the installation of a ramp qualified as an MCI. The DHCR stated that the installation of a ramp at the building entrance by itself didn't qualify as an MCI. It might only qualify if installed in conjunction with a new courtyard and walkways.

(DHCR prior opinion submitted by Hadassah S. Kwestel of the Hewlett, N.Y., law firm of Pennisi, Daniels & Norelli, LLP, attorneys for the landlord.) Landlord asked the DHCR for a prior opinion as to whether the installation of a ramp qualified as an MCI. The DHCR stated that the installation of a ramp at the building entrance by itself didn't qualify as an MCI. It might only qualify if installed in conjunction with a new courtyard and walkways.

370 Manhattan: Prior Opinion on Proposed MCI; DRA Dckt. No. ZOE-430013-OP (7/11/00) [1-pg. doc.]

Downloads

ZOE-430013-OP.pdf61.99 KB