Terrace/Balcony Reconstruction

September 30, 2001

LVT Number: 15350

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on terrace/balcony reconstruction. The DRA ruled for landlord. Tenants appealed, claiming that landlord merely filled in cracks and did resurfacing. The DHCR ruled against tenants. Landlord submitted copies of contractor's certifications, invoices, and canceled checks, all documenting the work done.

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on terrace/balcony reconstruction. The DRA ruled for landlord. Tenants appealed, claiming that landlord merely filled in cracks and did resurfacing. The DHCR ruled against tenants. Landlord submitted copies of contractor's certifications, invoices, and canceled checks, all documenting the work done.

Jacobs: DHCR Admin. Rev. Dckt. Nos. NA930044RT, NA930045RT, NA930046RT, and NA930047RT (8/30/01) [2-pg. doc.]

Downloads

NA930044RT.pdf107.29 KB

Topics

More like this