Pointing/Waterproofing Were Building- Wide Improvements

February 1, 1993

LVT Number: 6702

The DRA denied landlord's application for MCI rent increases based on pointing and waterproofing, finding that not all exterior walls were pointed. Landlord appealed, and the DHCR granted landlord's application. Landlord submitted a diagram showing the extent to which the exposed sides of the building were pointed. The contractor stated that all sides of the building were examined and that pointing was done wherever necessary. The DHCR's policy is that pointing and waterproofing that are comprehensive and performed where necessary qualify as an MCI.

The DRA denied landlord's application for MCI rent increases based on pointing and waterproofing, finding that not all exterior walls were pointed. Landlord appealed, and the DHCR granted landlord's application. Landlord submitted a diagram showing the extent to which the exposed sides of the building were pointed. The contractor stated that all sides of the building were examined and that pointing was done wherever necessary. The DHCR's policy is that pointing and waterproofing that are comprehensive and performed where necessary qualify as an MCI. Approximately 9,000 square feet of pointing was done on all exposed sides of landlord's building.

[122-126 St. Marks Place Assoc.: DHCR Adm. Rev. Dckt. No. BE 430192-RO (12/29/92)]. 3-page document.

Downloads

BE430192-RO.pdf186.35 KB

Topics

More like this