Pointing Work Done Building Wide

LVT Number: 16858

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on pointing work. The DRA ruled for landlord. Tenant appealed, claiming that the work wasn't done on a building-wide basis. The DHCR ruled against tenant. Landlord's pointing work was substantial and qualified as an MCI. Landlord's renovation contract called for 4,550 square feet of pointing, the contractor submitted a diagram of the work, and landlord's architect stated that the pointing work was comprehensive.

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on pointing work. The DRA ruled for landlord. Tenant appealed, claiming that the work wasn't done on a building-wide basis. The DHCR ruled against tenant. Landlord's pointing work was substantial and qualified as an MCI. Landlord's renovation contract called for 4,550 square feet of pointing, the contractor submitted a diagram of the work, and landlord's architect stated that the pointing work was comprehensive.

Murray: DHCR Adm. Rev. Dckt. No. RF430009RT (9/16/03) [2-pg. doc.]

Downloads

RF430009RT.pdf131.06 KB