No Rent Hike for Sidewalk Bridge Provided at No Cost

July 31, 2007

LVT Number: #19803

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on exterior restoration work, window installation, asbestos removal, and a sidewalk bridge. The DRA ruled for landlord in part but disallowed any increase for the cost of the sidewalk bridge. Landlord appealed and lost. Landlord's contractor stated that the bridge was being provided "at no additional cost," so the $17,570 originally listed as the cost for the sidewalk bridge was correctly disallowed.

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on exterior restoration work, window installation, asbestos removal, and a sidewalk bridge. The DRA ruled for landlord in part but disallowed any increase for the cost of the sidewalk bridge. Landlord appealed and lost. Landlord's contractor stated that the bridge was being provided "at no additional cost," so the $17,570 originally listed as the cost for the sidewalk bridge was correctly disallowed.

219 East 69th Street: DHCR Adm. Rev.Docket No. SJ410022RT (4/24/07) [5-pg. doc.]

Downloads

SJ 410022-RT.pdf161.76 KB

Topics

More like this