No Active Leaks After Roof Work Performed

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on the installation of a new roof, asbestos removal, exterior restoration including pointing and waterproofing, and architect fees. The DRA ruled for landlord. Tenants appealed, claiming that there were new or continuing leaks despite the claimed work. The DHCR ruled against tenants. DHCR inspection showed leak damage in the form of peeling paint and plaster, and stains, in four out of 59 apartments. But moisture readings in the four apartments were dry, and there was no proof of active leaks. This was insufficient grounds to deny the MCI rent hikes.

135 Central Park West: DHCR Adm. Rev. Docket No. RH430067RT (4/6/11) [5-pg. doc.]