Landlord Restored Intercom Service

July 31, 2011

LVT Number: #23517

Rent-stabilized tenants complained of a reduction in services. They claimed that the intercom system wasn't working. The DRA ruled for tenants and reduced their rents. Landlord later applied for rent restoration based on the restoration of services. The DHCR ruled against landlord, who appealed, claiming that the DHCR's decision was arbitrary and unreasonable. The court ruled for landlord and the DRA issued a new order restoring tenants' rents. Tenants then appealed, claiming that the intercom system currently wasn't working.

Rent-stabilized tenants complained of a reduction in services. They claimed that the intercom system wasn't working. The DRA ruled for tenants and reduced their rents. Landlord later applied for rent restoration based on the restoration of services. The DHCR ruled against landlord, who appealed, claiming that the DHCR's decision was arbitrary and unreasonable. The court ruled for landlord and the DRA issued a new order restoring tenants' rents. Tenants then appealed, claiming that the intercom system currently wasn't working. The DHCR ruled against tenants, based on the court's decision.

1777 Grand Concourse: DHCR Adm. Rev. Docket Nos. YD610038RT, YE610001RT, YE610005RT (6/15/11) [2-pg. doc.]

Downloads

YD610038RT.pdf50.94 KB

Topics

More like this