Finding Doesn't Reflect Inspector's Comments

December 1, 2003

LVT Number: 17009

Tenant complained of a reduction in services. The DRA ruled for tenant and reduced his rent. Landlord later applied for rent restoration based on restoration of services. The DRA ruled against landlord. It found that the defective mailroom lock condition hadn't been repaired. Landlord appealed. The DRA stated in its order that the mailroom door lock had no defects. So it was inconsistent to find that it hadn't been repaired. The DHCR ruled for landlord.

Tenant complained of a reduction in services. The DRA ruled for tenant and reduced his rent. Landlord later applied for rent restoration based on restoration of services. The DRA ruled against landlord. It found that the defective mailroom lock condition hadn't been repaired. Landlord appealed. The DRA stated in its order that the mailroom door lock had no defects. So it was inconsistent to find that it hadn't been repaired. The DHCR ruled for landlord.

College Overlook LLC: DHCR Adm. Rev. Dckt. No. QL430070RO (11/7/03) [3-pg. doc.]

Downloads

QL430070RO.pdf122.51 KB

Topics

More like this