Facade Restored in Landmark Building

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on facade work. The DRA ruled against landlord because the work wasn't performed on all exposed sides of the building. Landlord appealed, pointing out that the building was a landmark in a historic district. Landlord argued that the facade work was required and approved by the Landmarks Preservation Commission. The DHCR ruled for landlord. The facade of the building was completely restored and approved by the Landmarks Preservation Commission. Landlord's contractor also stated that the side and rear walls of the building were in good condition and didn't need any work.

Denova, Inc.: DHCR Adm. Rev. Dckt. No. OD230022RO (9/26/00) [4-pg. doc.]