Thermal Replacement Windows

LVT Number: 15487

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on the installation of thermal replacement windows. The DRA ruled for landlord. Tenant appealed, claiming that the windows were defective and that he wasn't notified that the new windows would result in a rent increase. The DHCR ruled against tenant. The DRA sent tenant notice of landlord's MCI application, and tenant didn't object. Tenant also submitted no proof to support his claim that the windows were defective.

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on the installation of thermal replacement windows. The DRA ruled for landlord. Tenant appealed, claiming that the windows were defective and that he wasn't notified that the new windows would result in a rent increase. The DHCR ruled against tenant. The DRA sent tenant notice of landlord's MCI application, and tenant didn't object. Tenant also submitted no proof to support his claim that the windows were defective.

Castle: DHCR Admin. Rev. Dckt. No. PD930030RT (10/24/01) [2-pg. doc.]

Downloads

PD930030RT.pdf115.94 KB