Tenant's Complaint About Doorman Was Unrelated to Key Fob Installation

Landlord asked for DHCR approval to modify building-wide services by installing a key fob on the building foyer door. The DRA ruled for landlord. Tenant appealed and lost. Tenant argued that the DRA's decision should be amended because, in several places, it stated incorrectly that the doorman would continue to provide the same services to residents, but the doorman had been moved to the middle of the inner lobby away from his former front lobby location. But tenant's PAR failed to claim any error of fact or law of the DRA's decision concerning the key fob. The DRA had issued a separate order granting landlord's other application to relocate the doorman's station from the lobby vestibule to the main, inner lobby in the building. The doorman service was unrelated to the key fob. So tenant's PAR must be dismissed.

Horenstein: DHCR Adm. Rev. Docket No. HQ430015RT (10/3/19) [2-pg. doc.]