Steel Beam and Column Replacement

Landlord applied for MCI rent increases based on a number of improvements. The DRA ruled for landlord in part but disallowed any increase for steel beam and column replacement. Landlord appealed, claiming that this work included the shoring of the structure from the 10th floor to the roof; the demolition of exterior masonry and interior finishes to allow for column and beam removal and replacement; the partial rebuilding of the parapet wall and of the building corners; and masonry repairs. Landlord claimed that this work was necessary to restore one of the parapets connected to the roof. The DHCR ruled against landlord. Landlord had previously performed facade restoration at the building. This should have ensured that the steel beam and column replacement was unnecessary. So tenants shouldn't bear the cost for work of a similar nature prior to the expiration of the useful life of the facade restoration, pointing, and waterproofing.

440 Riverside Dr.: DHCR Adm. Rev. Dckt. Nos. JH430155RO, JH530154RT (10/3/96) [7-page document]