Renovation of Water Tower Doesn't Qualify

LVT Number: 14790

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on a complete rebuilding of the building's water tank structure. The DRA ruled against landlord. Landlord appealed and lost. Landlord's MCI application indicated that it had completely renovated the water tower structure. This wasn't an MCI. If landlord had replaced the water tower in connection with a qualifying MCI, the work would have qualified.

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on a complete rebuilding of the building's water tank structure. The DRA ruled against landlord. Landlord appealed and lost. Landlord's MCI application indicated that it had completely renovated the water tower structure. This wasn't an MCI. If landlord had replaced the water tower in connection with a qualifying MCI, the work would have qualified.

Clarendon Mgmt. Corp.: DHCR Adm. Rev. Dckt. No. GF430088RO (1/4/01) [2-pg. doc.]

Downloads

GF430088RO.pdf102.67 KB