Notice to Cure Wasn't Defective

September 30, 1995

LVT Number: 10035

Landlord sued to evict tenant for nuisance. The court ruled against landlord, finding that landlord's notice to cure was defective. Landlord appealed. The appeals court ruled for landlord and reopened the case. Even though landlord's notice to cure didn't specifically identify tenant's wife as the offending party, the notice clearly notified tenant of the conduct complained of and specified the lease provisions claimed to be violated.

Landlord sued to evict tenant for nuisance. The court ruled against landlord, finding that landlord's notice to cure was defective. Landlord appealed. The appeals court ruled for landlord and reopened the case. Even though landlord's notice to cure didn't specifically identify tenant's wife as the offending party, the notice clearly notified tenant of the conduct complained of and specified the lease provisions claimed to be violated.

Park Holding Co. v. Grossman: NYLJ, p. 26, col. 1 (9/19/95) (App. T. 1 Dept.; Parness, JP, Miller, McCooe, JJ)

Topics

More like this