No Relationship Proved Between Landlord and Contractor

LVT Number: #20151

Tenant complained of a rent overcharge. The DRA ruled for tenant in part but allowed an increase of $235 per month for individual apartment improvements made before tenant moved into the apartment. Tenant appealed, claiming that landlord had a financial interest in the construction company that performed the apartment work. In response, landlord and its contractor submitted sworn statements that they had no personal connection and no relationship, common ownership, or financial interest. The DHCR ruled against tenant.

Tenant complained of a rent overcharge. The DRA ruled for tenant in part but allowed an increase of $235 per month for individual apartment improvements made before tenant moved into the apartment. Tenant appealed, claiming that landlord had a financial interest in the construction company that performed the apartment work. In response, landlord and its contractor submitted sworn statements that they had no personal connection and no relationship, common ownership, or financial interest. The DHCR ruled against tenant. Landlord submitted copies of invoices and cancelled checks showing payment for the improvements. Tenant presented no proof that there was any relationship between landlord and its contractor. In addition, the existence of a relationship wouldn't invalidate the rent increase, but would simply require closer examination.

Bradley Apts. Co., LLC/Checkik: DHCR Adm. Rev. Docket Nos. VD210017RO, VD210022RT (10/19/07) [3-pg. doc.]

Downloads

VD210017-RO.pdf310.67 KB