No PAR Supplement Filed

LVT Number: 19142

Tenant complained of a rent overcharge. The DRA ruled for tenant and ordered landlord to refund $9,000, including triple damages. Landlord appealed and lost. In its PAR, landlord stated only that the DRA's order was ''arbitrary and capricious and received late,'' and ''supplemental PAR to follow.'' However, two months later, landlord had not filed a PAR supplement nor requested any further information from the DHCR about the case. The DHCR dismissed the PAR because landlord failed to give any reason that the DRA's order should be revoked or modified.

Tenant complained of a rent overcharge. The DRA ruled for tenant and ordered landlord to refund $9,000, including triple damages. Landlord appealed and lost. In its PAR, landlord stated only that the DRA's order was ''arbitrary and capricious and received late,'' and ''supplemental PAR to follow.'' However, two months later, landlord had not filed a PAR supplement nor requested any further information from the DHCR about the case. The DHCR dismissed the PAR because landlord failed to give any reason that the DRA's order should be revoked or modified.

2003 Greenpoint Hotel, LLC: DHCR Adm. Rev. Docket No. UE210060RO 7/26/06 [2-pg. doc.]

Downloads

UE210060RO.pdf93.29 KB