New Rubberized Roof

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on exterior resurfacing, parapets, and a new rubberized roof. The DRA ruled against landlord based on landlord's failure to submit requested proof of improvements. Landlord appealed, claiming that it had submitted the requested documentation. The DHCR ruled for landlord in part. Landlord had submitted a cost breakdown for the rubberized roof and parapet work, and showed that the parapet work was done in connection with the new roof. The DHCR granted an MCI rent hike for this work. But landlord never submitted requested plans, diagrams, or descriptions of the resurfacing work. So the DHCR denied any rent hike for this work.

Kelly: DHCR Adm. Rev. Dckt. No. SC430079RO (7/27/04) [4-pg. doc.]