Landlord Submitted Contract for Elevator Upgrade

September 30, 2003

LVT Number: 16854

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on an elevator upgrade. The DRA ruled for landlord. Tenant appealed, claiming that because landlord didn't submit all required documents to the DHCR on time, the effective date of the MCI rent hike should be delayed, and that tenants didn't have proper chance to object to landlord's application. The DHCR ruled against tenant. The DRA asked landlord to submit the complete contract for the work done while landlord's application was pending.

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on an elevator upgrade. The DRA ruled for landlord. Tenant appealed, claiming that because landlord didn't submit all required documents to the DHCR on time, the effective date of the MCI rent hike should be delayed, and that tenants didn't have proper chance to object to landlord's application. The DHCR ruled against tenant. The DRA asked landlord to submit the complete contract for the work done while landlord's application was pending. Landlord did so, and otherwise provided adequate proof of the work done and the cost at the time of filing its MCI application.

Magida: DHCR Adm. Rev. Dckt. No. LL410037RT (7/31/03) [12-pg. doc.]

Downloads

LL410037RT.pdf688.46 KB

Topics

More like this