Landlord Didn't Prove Correction of 'C' Violations

March 1, 2004

LVT Number: 17163

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on pointing and waterproofing. The DRA ruled against landlord because landlord didn't submit proof that it had corrected immediately hazardous ''C'' violations existing at the building. Landlord appealed, claiming that it had corrected all violations. The DHCR ruled against landlord. Landlord had previously applied for MCI rent hikes for the same improvements. The prior application was denied because of the ''C'' violations. Landlord never appealed the prior decision.

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on pointing and waterproofing. The DRA ruled against landlord because landlord didn't submit proof that it had corrected immediately hazardous ''C'' violations existing at the building. Landlord appealed, claiming that it had corrected all violations. The DHCR ruled against landlord. Landlord had previously applied for MCI rent hikes for the same improvements. The prior application was denied because of the ''C'' violations. Landlord never appealed the prior decision. In addition, review of HPD records showed that there were still 21 class ''C'' immediately hazardous violations at the building.

595 W. 207 Assocs. LLC: DHCR Adm. Rev. Dckt. No. RI430002RO (11/4/03) [2-pg. doc.]

Downloads

RI430002RO.pdf133.68 KB

Topics

More like this