Landlord Didn't Prove Comprehensive Pointing and Waterproofing Done

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on pointing and waterproofing the building. The DRA denied landlord's application because the pointing and waterproofing work hadn't been done on 100 percent of the building's exterior. Landlord appealed, and the DHCR ruled against landlord. The DHCR found that the work done was insufficient to qualify for an MCI increase. Landlord didn't submit a description indicating the specific areas where waterproofing and pointing were done. And landlord substituted waterproofing for pointing on two exterior walls.

Caviris: DHCR Adm. Rev. Dckt. No. IC 110002-RP (3/18/94) [6-page document]