Harassment Proceeding Inspection Not Relevant

LVT Number: 10475

Landlord applied for MCI rent increases based on new windows. The DRA ruled for landlord, and tenants appealed. They pointed out that an inspection in a DHCR harassment proceeding indicated that there were building violations and conditions requiring repair. The DHCR ruled against tenants. Absent a rent reduction order or other finding of reduced required services at the building, there was no reason to revoke the MCI increase.

Landlord applied for MCI rent increases based on new windows. The DRA ruled for landlord, and tenants appealed. They pointed out that an inspection in a DHCR harassment proceeding indicated that there were building violations and conditions requiring repair. The DHCR ruled against tenants. Absent a rent reduction order or other finding of reduced required services at the building, there was no reason to revoke the MCI increase.

Collazo: DHCR Adm. Rev. Dckt. Nos. DD210330RT; DD210331RT; DD210332RT (9/27/95) [2-page document]

Downloads

DD210330RT.pdf108.67 KB