Harassment Proceeding Inspection Not Relevant
LVT Number: 10475
Landlord applied for MCI rent increases based on new windows. The DRA ruled for landlord, and tenants appealed. They pointed out that an inspection in a DHCR harassment proceeding indicated that there were building violations and conditions requiring repair. The DHCR ruled against tenants. Absent a rent reduction order or other finding of reduced required services at the building, there was no reason to revoke the MCI increase.
Collazo: DHCR Adm. Rev. Dckt. Nos. DD210330RT; DD210331RT; DD210332RT (9/27/95) [2-page document]
Downloads
DD210330RT.pdf | 108.67 KB |