Application Doesn't Adequately Describe Work

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on a masonry upgrade. The DRA ruled against landlord. Landlord appealed and lost. The DRA had twice requested additional information, including contracts, a check breakdown, a contractor's statement regarding pointing and waterproofing, a diagram, and a contractor's statement regarding the work done and total cost. Landlord submitted only job specifications, a statement that there were no written contracts, and a claimed cost breakdown. Landlord didn't submit sufficient details as to the exact work done. Landlord's descriptions indicated the materials to be used, but didn't indicate the scope of the project or what was actually done.

Phipps Houses Svcs., Inc.: DHCR Admin. Rev. Dckt. No. EF430145RO (4/17/02) [2-pg. doc.]