Landlord applied to the DHCR for a ruling that its building was exempt from rent stabilization based on substantial rehabilitation performed in 2009 within the meaning of RSC Section 2520.11(e). The DRA ruled against...
Landlord filed an application with the DHCR in August 2022, seeking a determination that its building was exempt from rent stabilization due to substantial rehabilitation. In January 2023, landlord requested that its...
Tenant complained to the DHCR of rent overcharge. The DRA ruled against tenant shortly after the agency issued a separate order finding that the building was exempt from rent regulation due to substantial...
Landlord applied to the DHCR for a ruling that its building was exempt from rent stabilization due to a substantial rehabilitation performed after Jan. 1, 1974. The DRA ruled against landlord, finding that landlord...
Landlord applied to the DHCR in 2021 for a ruling that its building was exempt from rent stabilization based on substantial rehabilitation commenced in June 2015 and completed in 2020. The DRA ruled for landlord,...
The prior landlord of a Westchester County building asked the DHCR in 2019 for a ruling that its Mt. Vernon premises was exempt from rent regulation due to substantial rehabilitation. The DRA ruled against landlord...
Landlord applied to the DHCR in 2019, seeking a ruling that its building was exempt from rent stabilization due to a substantial rehabilitation completed in 2011. The DRA ruled for landlord in 2022 based on...
Landlord asked the DHCR for a ruling that its building was exempt from rent stabilization due to substantial rehabilitation. The DRA ruled against landlord, who appealed and lost. The DRA correctly found that the DOB...
Landlord applied for a ruling from the DHCR that its building was exempt from rent stabilization due to substantial rehabilitation. Landlord said that it bought the vacant building in 2021 and performed gut...
Landlord asked the DHCR for a ruling that its building was exempt from rent stabilization due to a substantial rehabilitation landlord claimed was completed between 1978 and 1981. The DRA ruled against landlord.
