Termination Notice Not Defective

March 1, 1994

LVT Number: 8605

(Decision submitted by Manhattan attorney Michael K. Brown, who represented the landlord.) Landlord sued to evict tenant, based on substantial lease violations and nuisance. Tenant claimed that landlord's termination notice and notice to cure were defective. The court ruled against tenant. Landlord's notices were specific enough. And tenant didn't prove that landlord had improperly served the termination notice or accepted rent payments after terminating the tenancy.

(Decision submitted by Manhattan attorney Michael K. Brown, who represented the landlord.) Landlord sued to evict tenant, based on substantial lease violations and nuisance. Tenant claimed that landlord's termination notice and notice to cure were defective. The court ruled against tenant. Landlord's notices were specific enough. And tenant didn't prove that landlord had improperly served the termination notice or accepted rent payments after terminating the tenancy.

Brand v. Sell: Index No. 100515/93 (11/9/93) (Civ. Ct. NY; Malatzky, J) [1-page document]

Downloads

100515-93.pdf160.61 KB

Topics

More like this