Tenant Claims Landlord's LEP Policy Discriminated Against Housing Applicants
LVT Number: #32203
A not-for-profit group advocating against housing discrimination sued landlord for violations of the Fair Housing Act of 1968 (FHA) and the New York State Human Rights Law (NYSHRL) based on refusal to rent to a prospective tenant with limited English proficiency (LEP). It claimed that landlord discriminated against a prospective tenant whose primary language was Spanish. Landlord wouldn't rent an apartment to this tenant unless someone who spoke English lived with her at the building. Plaintiff also had several testers inquire about rentals with similar results. Plaintiff argued that landlord's LEP policy disproportionately and unjustifiably impacted prospective tenants on the basis of their national origin and race.
Landlord asked the court to dismiss the case, arguing that: (a) a prospective tenant's language or LEP status wasn't a protected class under the FHA or NYSHRL; and (b) the complaint failed to otherwise identify the prospective tenants' race or national origins. In response, plaintiff argued that, consistent with HUD guidance and case law, a prospective tenant may adequately plead discrimination based on race or national origin using proof of a housing policy employing language-related criteria. The U.S. government submitted a statement of interest supporting the plaintiff's position.
The court ruled against landlord and wouldn't dismiss the case. The court gave deference to a 2016 HUD Guidance that had concluded that LEP was often used as a pretext for national origin or race discrimination and that the FHA may therefore be violated by "selective application of a language-related policy, or use of LEP as a pretext for unequal treatment of individuals based on race, national origin, or other protected characteristics." The court also found that nothing in the language of the FHA or related regulations prohibited the use of proof of LEP criteria as a pretext for race or national origin discrimination. And plaintiff didn't need to identify the specific national origin or race of particular tenants in order to state an initial case of discrimination under the FHA.
CNY Fair Hous., Inc. v. Swiss Vill., LLC: Dckt. No. 5:21-CV-1217 (MAD/ML), 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120385 (NDNY; 7/8/22; D'Agostino, USDJ)
More like this
- Tenant Claims Landlord's Visitor Policy Is Overly Restrictive
- Prospective Shareholder-Tenant's Discrimination Claim Against Co-op Dismissed
- Landlord's Lawsuit Against DHCR for Post-HSTPA IAI Policy Change Dismissed
- Co-op Waived Monetary Penalties Against Shareholder Tenant Who Violated No-Pet Policy