Tenant Claims Contractor Didn't Clean Up After Work

LVT Number: 15366

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on pointing and waterproofing. The DRA ruled for landlord. Tenant appealed, claiming that landlord's contractor didn't clean up properly after the MCI work. The DHCR ruled against tenant. Landlord proved the cost and work done to qualify for the MCI increase. Cleanup questions didn't bar collection of the MCI. If there was a service problem, tenant must file a reduction in services complaint.

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on pointing and waterproofing. The DRA ruled for landlord. Tenant appealed, claiming that landlord's contractor didn't clean up properly after the MCI work. The DHCR ruled against tenant. Landlord proved the cost and work done to qualify for the MCI increase. Cleanup questions didn't bar collection of the MCI. If there was a service problem, tenant must file a reduction in services complaint.

Geisler: DHCR Admin. Rev. Dckt. No. PF430016RT (9/6/01) [2-pg. doc.]

Downloads

PF430016RT.pdf120.82 KB