Tax Exemption Didn't Result in Rent Stabilization Coverage
LVT Number: #26911
Tenant claimed that she was rent stabilized and complained that landlord refused to renew her lease. The DHCR ruled against tenant, who then filed an Article 78 appeal. The DHCR agreed to take the case back for reconsideration, and then ruled against tenant again. The building was subject to a Real Property Tax Law Section 420-c tax exemption. Under this exemption, landlord made three separate regulatory agreements: with the Housing Trust Fund Corporation, with the DHCR, and with HPD. While landlord’s agreement with the DHCR imposed rent restrictions, it didn’t subject the building to rent stabilization. The fact that landlord registered the apartment with the DHCR as rent stabilized was an error and didn’t subject the building to rent stabilization. Since the building wasn’t rent stabilized, the DHCR had no jurisdiction to rule on tenant’s complaint.
Scott: DHCR Adm. Rev. Docket No. DX410004RP (2/17/16) [2-pg. doc.]
Downloads
DX410004RP.pdf | 629.2 KB |
Topics
More like this
- Landlord Who Converted Building for Owner Occupancy Didn't Prove Exemption from Rent Stabilization
- HPD Regulatory Agreement Didn't Exempt Building from Rent Stabilization
- Reconstruction of Demolished Building Resulted in Exemption from Rent Regulation
- Building Constructed in 1998 Without Tax Benefits Exempt from Rent Stabilization