Rent Concession Rider Providing for Late Payment of Rent Was Improper
LVT Number: #26786
Landlord sued to evict rent-stabilized tenant for nonpayment of rent. The court ruled for landlord based on tenant’s default but later granted tenant’s request to vacate the default judgment. Landlord appealed and lost. Tenant showed good cause to vacate the default judgment. Tenant’s lease included a rent concession rider, which stated that, while tenant’s legal monthly rent was $1,339, tenant could pay a reduced rent of $1,185 provided she paid her rent by the fifth of the month. The court found that the rent concession was a preferential rent and, as such, couldn’t fluctuate monthly. The rent concession rider in effect called for a 13 percent late charge, which was excessive. The court properly vacated the default judgment.
Diversified Equities, LLC v. Russell: 50 Misc.3d 140(A), 2016 NY Slip Op 50177(U) (App. T. 2 Dept.; 2/10/16; Pesce, PJ, Weston, Aliotta, JJ)
More like this
- Did Landlord Improperly Use Rent Concessions in 421-a Program?
- Tenants Can Pursue Class Action Based on Claim That Landlord Improperly Used Rent Concessions
- Court Will Reconsider Whether Rent Concessions for Initial 421-a Tenants Were Improper
- Tenants Can Proceed with Overcharge Claims Based on Improper Rent Concessions