Prior Tenant Didn't Challenge How DC-2 Notice Was Delivered

LVT Number: 13543

(Decision submitted by Jack Kuttner of the Manhattan law firm of Kucker Kraus & Bruh, LLP, attorneys for the landlord.) Tenant complained of a rent overcharge, claiming that the first rent-stabilized rent for the apartment was greater than the fair market rent. The DRA ruled against tenant, and tenant appealed, claiming, among other things, that landlord hadn't sent the DC-2 notice of tenant's right to challenge the fair market rent to prior tenant in 1987 by certified mail. The DHCR ruled against tenant.

(Decision submitted by Jack Kuttner of the Manhattan law firm of Kucker Kraus & Bruh, LLP, attorneys for the landlord.) Tenant complained of a rent overcharge, claiming that the first rent-stabilized rent for the apartment was greater than the fair market rent. The DRA ruled against tenant, and tenant appealed, claiming, among other things, that landlord hadn't sent the DC-2 notice of tenant's right to challenge the fair market rent to prior tenant in 1987 by certified mail. The DHCR ruled against tenant. Landlord personally delivered the DC-2 notice to prior tenant, who signed landlord's copy to acknowledge receipt. Although the law required delivery by certified mail, delivery of the DC-2 notice by other means was acceptable, since prior tenant didn't complain within 90 days.

Binder: DHCR Adm. Rev. Dckt. No. MB410039RT (9/17/99) [2-pg. doc.]

Downloads

MB410039RT.pdf110.6 KB