Presumption of Retaliatory Eviction Doesn't Apply
LVT Number: #24528
Landlord sued to evict tenant for nonpayment of rent. Tenant claimed retaliatory eviction as a defense, because landlord started the case within six months after tenant complained to HPD about apartment conditions. Landlord asked the court to dismiss this defense. The court ruled for landlord. Real Property Law (RPL) Section 223-b contains a statutory presumption that an eviction proceeding commenced within six months of a tenant complaint is retaliatory. But RPL Section 223-b(5)(c) clearly states that this presumption doesn't apply in a nonpayment proceeding.
101 Cooper Street LLC v. McCune: 37 Misc.3d 1231(A), 2012 NY Slip Op 52255(U) (Civ. Ct. NY; 12/12/12; Stoller, J)
More like this
- Landlord Doesn't Prove There Was a Renewal Lease Corresponding to Its Nonrenewal Notice
- HSTPA Choice of Forum Provision Doesn't Bar Court from Transferring Case to DHCR
- Virtual Trial Doesn't Deny Tenants Due Process
- Court Won't Reject Tenant's Hardship Declaration Where Landlord Doesn't Prove Nuisance