MCR Properly Calculated

November 1, 2003

LVT Number: 16947

(Decision submitted by James R. Marino of the Manhattan law firm of Kucker & Bruh, LLP, attorneys for the landlord.) Rent-controlled tenant complained of a rent overcharge. He claimed that the MCR for 2002 was improperly calculated and that landlord overcharged him by collecting a 1996 MCI rent hike. The DRA ruled against tenant. Tenant appealed and lost. The tenant's MCR was calculated properly. And tenant never appealed the MCI rent hike that the DRA granted landlord in 1996. Landlord properly collected $7 per room for tenant's nine-room apartment based on the MCI rent hike.

(Decision submitted by James R. Marino of the Manhattan law firm of Kucker & Bruh, LLP, attorneys for the landlord.) Rent-controlled tenant complained of a rent overcharge. He claimed that the MCR for 2002 was improperly calculated and that landlord overcharged him by collecting a 1996 MCI rent hike. The DRA ruled against tenant. Tenant appealed and lost. The tenant's MCR was calculated properly. And tenant never appealed the MCI rent hike that the DRA granted landlord in 1996. Landlord properly collected $7 per room for tenant's nine-room apartment based on the MCI rent hike.

Rosenblum: DHCR Adm. Rev. Dckt. No. QJ420041RT (9/30/03) [2-pg. doc.]

Downloads

QJ420041RT.pdf121.15 KB

Topics

More like this