Landlord Didn't Prove Cost of Work

LVT Number: 15294

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on the installation of a new roof and new windows. The DRA ruled against landlord because landlord didn't prove the cost of the work done. Landlord appealed and lost. Landlord had submitted a roof contract that called for a cash payment, but nothing specified what goods or services were provided. Landlord was asked by the DRA for further explanation but submitted none.

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on the installation of a new roof and new windows. The DRA ruled against landlord because landlord didn't prove the cost of the work done. Landlord appealed and lost. Landlord had submitted a roof contract that called for a cash payment, but nothing specified what goods or services were provided. Landlord was asked by the DRA for further explanation but submitted none.

Finocchio: DHCR Admin. Rev. Dckt. Nos. FB130030RO and FI130337RO (8/13/01) [3-pg. doc.]

Downloads

FB130030RO.pdf237.92 KB