Hazardous Violations Corrected

January 1, 2003

LVT Number: 16315

(Decision submitted by Robert H. Gordon of the Manhattan law firm of Shaw & Binder, attorneys for the landlord.) Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on elevator upgrading. The DRA ruled for landlord. Tenants appealed, claiming that there were hazardous violations that barred the rent hike. The DHCR ruled against tenants. Landlord had submitted to the DRA proof from HPD that any hazardous violations at the building had been cleared.

(Decision submitted by Robert H. Gordon of the Manhattan law firm of Shaw & Binder, attorneys for the landlord.) Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on elevator upgrading. The DRA ruled for landlord. Tenants appealed, claiming that there were hazardous violations that barred the rent hike. The DHCR ruled against tenants. Landlord had submitted to the DRA proof from HPD that any hazardous violations at the building had been cleared.

Monnet: DHCR Admin. Rev. Dckt. No. LI410118RT (12/10/02) [2-pg. doc.]

Downloads

LI410118RT.pdf142.56 KB

Topics

More like this