DHCR Properly Allocated Pro Rata Share of Commercial Rent

July 31, 2003

LVT Number: 16726

(Decision submitted by James R. Marino of the Manhattan law firm of Kucker & Bruh, LLP, attorneys for the landlord.) Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes for elevator upgrading, rewiring, and window installation. The DRA ruled for landlord. Tenants appealed, claiming that the commercial rents used in calculating the MCI rent hike were incorrect and that commercial tenants were responsible for a larger share of the cost of the improvements than was found by the DRA. The DHCR ruled against tenants.

(Decision submitted by James R. Marino of the Manhattan law firm of Kucker & Bruh, LLP, attorneys for the landlord.) Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes for elevator upgrading, rewiring, and window installation. The DRA ruled for landlord. Tenants appealed, claiming that the commercial rents used in calculating the MCI rent hike were incorrect and that commercial tenants were responsible for a larger share of the cost of the improvements than was found by the DRA. The DHCR ruled against tenants. The DRA properly calculated the pro rata share of the MCI rent hikes allocable to commercial tenants.

Various Tenants of 200 W. 15th St.: DHCR Adm. Rev. Dckt. Nos. NC430059RT & NC430108RT (6/23/03) [3-pg. doc.]

Downloads

NC430059RT.pdf207.26 KB

Topics

More like this