Damaged Kitchen Countertop

July 31, 1993

LVT Number: 8119

Yonkers tenant complained of a reduction in services. The DRA ruled for tenant, and landlord appealed. Among other things, the DRA found that tenant's kitchen countertop was damaged. Landlord claimed that the countertop was merely worn from normal use and age, but that it functioned and wasn't hazardous. The DHCR found that landlord admitted that the countertop was worn and still refused to replace it. So, the DHCR dismissed landlord's PAR.

Yonkers tenant complained of a reduction in services. The DRA ruled for tenant, and landlord appealed. Among other things, the DRA found that tenant's kitchen countertop was damaged. Landlord claimed that the countertop was merely worn from normal use and age, but that it functioned and wasn't hazardous. The DHCR found that landlord admitted that the countertop was worn and still refused to replace it. So, the DHCR dismissed landlord's PAR.

1360 Midland Avenue, Apt. 2B: DHCR Adm. Rev. Dckt. No. EH 820003-RO (5/11/93) [3-page document]

Downloads

EH820003-RO.pdf167.75 KB

Topics

More like this