Balcony Installation

May 31, 2004

LVT Number: 17351

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on the installation of balconies. The DRA ruled for landlord, and tenant appealed. Tenant didn't have a balcony and claimed that he shouldn't have to pay for this improvement. The DHCR ruled against tenant. The DHCR and the courts have ruled previously that all tenants benefit directly or indirectly from a balcony installation, and so all tenants must pay the MCI rent hike.

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on the installation of balconies. The DRA ruled for landlord, and tenant appealed. Tenant didn't have a balcony and claimed that he shouldn't have to pay for this improvement. The DHCR ruled against tenant. The DHCR and the courts have ruled previously that all tenants benefit directly or indirectly from a balcony installation, and so all tenants must pay the MCI rent hike.

Spechler: DHCR Adm. Rev. Dckt. No. RJ110123RT (2/18/04) [2-pg. doc.]

Downloads

RJ110123RT.pdf97.26 KB

Topics

More like this