Amended RSL Provision Concerning Preferential Rent Applied Retroactively
LVT Number: #29950
Landlord sued to evict unregulated tenant. Tenant claimed that the apartment was rent stabilized. Tenant pointed to Rent Stabilization Law (RSL) Section 26-511(c)(14), which was amended in 2015 to provide an exception from vacancy deregulation where the prior tenant received a preferential rent. Landlord argued that the RSL amendment was added after the apartment became deregulated, and should be applied only prospectively. The court disagreed and ruled for tenant. The RSL amendment retroactively kept the apartment under rent stabilization. Therefore, the holdover petition stating that the apartment was deregulated was fatally defective because it didn't state the proper regulatory status of the premises.
191 Realty Assocs. v. Tejeda: Index No. 82076/17, NYLJ No. 1548749636 (Civ. T. NY; 12/27/19; Thermos, J)
More like this
- Court Applies Amended Law Retroactively, Finds Apartment Was Improperly Deregulated
- Recent Amendments to Rent Fraud Provisions Not Applied Retroactively to 2019 Complaint
- Federal Appeals Court Finds No Fifth Amendment Taking or Due Process Violation by HSTPA Amendments to RSL
- High-Rent/High-Income Deregulation Doesn't Apply to Buildings Subject to Rent Stabilization Under 421-a After July 2, 1984